Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,051 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Imran Khalid results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 1,319 hits. Analysis detected 8,735 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (963 of 6,169 authors). This Imran Khalid is worse (more manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
Imran Khalid
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
85%Imran Khalid (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,204
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

84% percentile
025507510084.4% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 31.4%31.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.7%14.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 10.2%10.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 11.6%11.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 17.7%17.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.4%14.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 31.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 14.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 17.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.7%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Author 10.2%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos