Keyword summary
81% 29 analyzed articles/videos 18,951 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pam Bondi results contain 55 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 13,811 hits . Analysis detected 92,480 faulty-reasoning hits from 83,628 analyzed words across 29 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (28,239 of 37,536 keywords). This Pam Bondi is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group. Pam Bondi
Keyword details
Total words: 83,628
Article count: 29
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score29 analyzed articles83.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst