BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Halo Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34% saturation with 281 hits. Analysis detected 3,141 faulty-reasoning hits from 826 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 72% and a BS Rank of 81% (4,320 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 80.30% of the article peer group.

Todd Blanche is “the right man for the right time,” a letter from 77 former Department of Justice officials declares in urging the Senate Judiciary Committee to support President Donald Trump’s pick to serve as the 88th U.S. 
Attorney General. 
The former high-ranking DOJ officials  spanning multiple administrations  sent the letter Sunday to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Ranking Member Sen. 
Dick Durban, R-Ill., in advance of Blanche’s confirmation hearing, beginning Wednesday morning. 
Blanche has served as acting U.S. attorney general since early April, following Attorney General Pam Bondi’s abrupt departure. 
“His exemplary record as Deputy Attorney General  and now as Acting Attorney General  demonstrates he is the right man for the right time,” states the letter signed by dozens of former DOJ deputies, assistant AGs, U.S. attorneys, and others. 
The group includes Gary Barnett, former acting chief of staff and senior counselor to the attorney general; Ketan Bhirud, former associate deputy attorney general; Rachel Bissex, former deputy chief of staff and counselor to the attorney general; and Jonathan D. 
Brightbill, former acting assistant attorney general. 
The recommendation notes Blanche’s rise up the ranks, beginning with his service with the DOJ as a paralegal in the Criminal Division and at the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York. 
He did so while going to law school at night and supporting his young family, the letter states. 
He went on to become an assistant U.S. attorney in the SDNY’s violent-crimes division, "where he prosecuted serious offenses for eight years," ultimately serving as co-chief of the unit. 
He "supervised dozens of prosecutors handling murder, kidnapping, and other violent crimes." 
“This hands-on experience as both a line prosecutor and supervisor gives him an unparalleled understanding of how the Department actually operates  from the streets to headquarters,” the letter asserts. 
‘Clarity and Resolve’ 
A Trump loyalist, Blanche successfully served as the president’s legal counsel during the left’s relentless lawfare campaigns against Trump and his allies  political witch hunts stopping at nothing to stop the businessman’s return to the White House. 
Blanche began Trump’s second term as the DOJ’s deputy attorney general. 
As the letter notes, in his role as acting AG, Blanche has overseen the day-to-day operations of a department with more than 100,000 employees in the main DOJ office, the FBI, the DEA, U.S. 
Marshals, ATF, and 93 U.S. 
Attorneys’ Offices. 
“Under his leadership, the Department has advanced President Trump’s core priorities with clarity and resolve: confronting illegal immigration and dismantling the transnational criminal organizations that exploit our borders; combating the fentanyl crisis and violent crime that devastate American communities; and protecting taxpayers through aggressive fraud enforcement,” the letter states. 
Blanche "launched the National Fraud Enforcement Division, which has already driven the recovery of billions of dollars stolen from programs like Medicare and COVID relief, while prioritizing the prosecution of those who prey on American taxpayers,” the support letter states. 
‘He Knows What Works’ 
Democrats hate him. 
They will do all in their power to make Blanche’s confirmation a bruising battle, if not a living hell. 
But the leftist activist groups strongly opposed to Blanche’s confirmation might just be an even more powerful endorsement of his candidacy. 
The list includes the far-left New York City Bar Association, Democrats Abroad, and the absurdly named Justice Connection, launched in 2024 to respond to “supposed heightened concerns among DOJ personnel regarding political retaliation, reassignments, and threats to the apolitical nature of civil service,” according to nonprofit tracker InfluenceWatch. 
Funded by the Government Accountability Project, a font of left-wing causes, Justice Connection seems to have a severe blind spot for the sweeping and unprecedented “political retaliation” perpetrated by the Biden Justice Department under corrupt Attorney General Merrick Garland. 
The Justice Connection and founder Stacey Young, a former long-time DOJ attorney and darling of the Trump-hating corporate media who holds a seething hatred for Trump, released a letter last week listing the names of 1,200-plus Justice Department employees urging the Senate to vote against Blanche’s confirmation. 
It’s standard leftist fare, twisting the rule of law into “corruption” and confusing accountability and justice with weaponization. 
Blanche has confronted and fought against actual weaponization. 
The former DOJ officials standing up for him note that he gets the DOJ’s mission, to deliver justice  “not to serve political interests.” 
That must be a refreshing change for the pro-life faithful prosecuted for praying, the parents harassed for speaking out against woke school board policies, and the Republican senators Biden’s DOJ spied on. 
“He has shown the courage and institutional knowledge to restore focus on public safety, law enforcement support, and the rule of law,” the letter states. 
“His career path  from paralegal to prosecutor to the second-highest position in the Department  gives him a perspective few others possess. 
“He knows what works because he has lived it at every level.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.7%M.D. Kittle: 6.2%The Federalist: 8.5%Confirmation Bias16.7%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%M.D. Kittle: 2.6%The Federalist: 3.5%Availability Heuristic4.1%This article: 7.4%M.D. Kittle: 0.8%The Federalist: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic7.4%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.7%The Federalist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%M.D. Kittle: 1.1%The Federalist: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias7.9%This article: 13.9%M.D. Kittle: 7.1%The Federalist: 10.1%Framing Effect13.9%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.2%M.D. Kittle: 0.6%The Federalist: 1.0%Optimism Bias8.2%This article: 6.2%M.D. Kittle: 0.8%The Federalist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias6.2%This article: 34.0%M.D. Kittle: 16.3%The Federalist: 12.4%Negativity Bias34.0%This article: 12.6%M.D. Kittle: 1.0%The Federalist: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias12.6%This article: 2.9%M.D. Kittle: 1.8%The Federalist: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error2.9%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 21.5%M.D. Kittle: 4.1%The Federalist: 3.9%In-Group Bias21.5%This article: 10.7%M.D. Kittle: 1.9%The Federalist: 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias10.7%This article: 26.9%M.D. Kittle: 1.9%The Federalist: 2.2%Halo Effect26.9%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 1.4%The Federalist: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 1.1%The Federalist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 4.7%M.D. Kittle: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias4.7%This article: 16.2%M.D. Kittle: 11.2%The Federalist: 5.3%Ad Hominem16.2%This article: 6.8%M.D. Kittle: 1.5%The Federalist: 2.7%Straw Man6.8%This article: 17.4%M.D. Kittle: 4.8%The Federalist: 5.0%Appeal to Authority17.4%This article: 5.4%M.D. Kittle: 1.5%The Federalist: 2.8%False Dilemma5.4%This article: 2.3%M.D. Kittle: 0.7%The Federalist: 2.3%Slippery Slope2.3%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.4%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.2%M.D. Kittle: 7.7%The Federalist: 11.4%Hasty Generalization6.2%This article: 2.2%M.D. Kittle: 0.3%The Federalist: 0.5%Red Herring2.2%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 24.1%M.D. Kittle: 7.6%The Federalist: 8.2%Appeal to Emotion24.1%This article: 1.5%M.D. Kittle: 2.7%The Federalist: 3.1%Begging the Question1.5%This article: 7.0%M.D. Kittle: 1.7%The Federalist: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 1.2%The Federalist: 0.5%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.6%The Federalist: 1.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 13.2%M.D. Kittle: 1.9%The Federalist: 2.8%Anecdotal13.2%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.3%M.D. Kittle: 1.3%The Federalist: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.3%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 10.4%M.D. Kittle: 1.5%The Federalist: 0.8%Genetic Fallacy10.4%This article: 18.0%M.D. Kittle: 3.7%The Federalist: 3.1%Unattributed Quote18.0%This article: 1.7%M.D. Kittle: 1.5%The Federalist: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection1.7%This article: 24.7%M.D. Kittle: 20.5%The Federalist: 19.7%Biased Writer Voice24.7%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 2.4%The Federalist: 5.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 2.9%M.D. Kittle: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias2.9%This article: 33.2%M.D. Kittle: 17.3%The Federalist: 15.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias33.2%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.3%The Federalist: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

826 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.