Topic summary
⁠85%4 analyzed articles/videos1,463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Judiciary Committee results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 1,477 hits. Analysis detected 12,230 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,960 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,808 of 16,558 topics). This Senate Judiciary Committee is worse (more manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group.
Senate Judiciary Committee

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510064.9% percentile
3.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.6%18.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 13.8%13.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.1%15.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.3%15.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos