Keyword summary
93%1 analyzed article/video826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sen Dick Durbin results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Authority, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 933 hits. Analysis detected 6,858 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 86% (5,287 of 37,536 keywords). This Sen Dick Durbin is worse (more manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group.
Sen Dick Durbin
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
86%Sen Dick Durbin (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,304
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

86% percentile
025507510085.9% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 28.2%28.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 22.2%22.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 17.5%17.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 16.5%16.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 28.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos