Keyword summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York City Bar Association results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Authority, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 933 hits. Analysis detected 6,858 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (5,283 of 37,536 keywords). This New York City Bar Association is worse (more manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group.
New York City Bar Association
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,304
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

86% percentile
025507510085.9% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 28.2%28.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 22.2%22.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 17.5%17.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 16.5%16.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 28.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos