Keyword summary
⁠33%5 analyzed articles/videos1,773 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil Facilities results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 1,280 hits. Analysis detected 9,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,228 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (22,545 of 37,536 keywords). This Oil Facilities is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Oil Facilities
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠40%Oil Facilities (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510039.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos