Author summary
64%3 analyzed articles/videos1,533 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hanna Arhirova results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 706 hits. Analysis detected 4,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,132 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (2,979 of 6,171 authors). This Hanna Arhirova is worse (more manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group.
Hanna Arhirova
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
52%Hanna Arhirova (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,132
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

52% percentile
025507510051.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.5%11.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate