Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These EPA results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 155 hits . Analysis detected 1,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This EPA is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. EPA
Author details
Total words: 1,324
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.1% 11.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 8.1% 8.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.4% 11.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.1%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst