Keyword summary
35% 11 analyzed articles/videos 4,296 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ntsb results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 1,762 hits . Analysis detected 14,768 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,988 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (27,200 of 34,689 keywords). This Ntsb is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group. Ntsb
Keyword details
Total words: 16,988
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score11 analyzed articles17K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst