Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,925 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie-Harp results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 2,335 hits . Analysis detected 14,055 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,575 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (14,426 of 37,533 keywords). This Natalie-Harp is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group. Natalie-Harp
Keyword details
Total words: 9,575
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.6% percentile 3.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 24.4% 24.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst