Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole Charky-Chami results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 1,063 hits . Analysis detected 6,359 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,166 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,078 of 6,628 authors). This Nicole Charky-Chami is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Nicole Charky-Chami
Author details
Total words: 5,166
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.7% percentile 3.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.0% 14.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 10.3% 10.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 10.3%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 7.9%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Tu Quoque: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst