Keyword summary
58% 8 analyzed articles/videos 6,280 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Letitia James results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 2,828 hits . Analysis detected 23,948 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,414 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (25,502 of 36,036 keywords). This Letitia James is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group. Letitia James
Keyword details
Total words: 22,414
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score8 analyzed articles22.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst