Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video404 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rich Calder results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 446 hits. Analysis detected 3,158 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of 91% (636 of 6,530 authors). This Rich Calder is worse (more manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group.
Rich Calder
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
91%Rich Calder (selected)7%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,616
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

90% percentile
025507510090.3% percentile
7.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 27.6%27.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 26.0%26.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 22.6%22.6%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Author 13.2%13.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 27.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Author 22.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.0%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Author 22.6%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Author 22.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Genetic Fallacy: Author 13.2%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.0%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos