Tens of thousands of 'No Kings' protestors rally in Manhattan against Trump ⁠68%

By Khristina Narizhnaya⁠0% Rich Calder⁠0%

3/28/2026, 11:41:58 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Availability Heuristic, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 1,068 faulty-reasoning hits from 404 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 61.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (7,110 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 67.50% of the article peer group.

Tens of thousands of people marched through Manhattan Saturday, protesting President Donald Trump and his policies, as part of the larger “No Kings” movement that included more than 3,000 other planned demonstrations nationwide. 
Demonstrators gathered at Columbus Circle and Central Park and marched down Seventh Avenue, banging drums and railing against the Trump administration’s “Operation Epic Fury” in Iran, its immigration policies and planned cuts to Medicaid and public education. 
Many chanted “No ICE! 
No Kings! 
No War!” 
and carried hand-written signs with slogans such as “Wake Up America, we are living in a fascist state!” 
and “Nothing is more American than opposing Trump.” 
Tens of thousands of people marched through Manhattan Saturday, protesting President Donald Trump and his policies as part of the larger “No Kings” movement that included more than 3,000 other demonstrations planned nationwide. 
John Angelillo/UPI/Shutterstock 
“It’s no King's Day. 
It's getting a little warmer out now, so it's a nice day to protest,” said Mike Heisy, a 63-year-old retiree. 
Others in attendance included radical, Trump-hating far-lefties like actor Robert De Niro and state Attorney General Letitia James. 
The vitriol towards the U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency and the rest of the Trump administration was well-funded. 
A network of 500 groups with an estimated budgets totaling $3 billion were behind the coordinated nationwide “No Kings” rallies, including communist groups funded by tech mogul and alleged Communist China Party propagandist Neville Singham, Fox News Digital reported. 
Indivisible, a national Democratic political advocacy organization funded by far-left billionaire George Soros, is the lead coordinator for the protests. 
Protestors swarm Times Square to protest Trump. 
AFP via Getty Images 
Other cities hosting the demonstrations included Washington D.C., Los Angeles, San Francisco, and St. 
Paul, Minn., the site of the flagship rally where organizers claimed more than 200,000 turned out. 
Rocker Bruce Springsteen performed his new protest song “Streets of Minneapolis,” and was joined by others including actor Jane Fonda and Vermont Sen. 
Bernie Sanders. 
Far-left actor Robert De Niro is joined at rally with civil rights leader Al Sharpton. 
ZUMAPRESS.com 
White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson dismissed the widespread rallies as being pushed by “leftist funding networks” and claimed they had little public support. 
The “only people who care about these Trump Derangement Therapy Sessions are the reporters who are paid to cover them,” Jackson said in a statement. 
With Post wires 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.1%Khristina Narizhnaya: 2.4%California Post: 4.1%Confirmation Bias10.1%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 17.8%Khristina Narizhnaya: 5.3%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic17.8%This article: 8.7%Khristina Narizhnaya: 1.3%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic8.7%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 15.3%Khristina Narizhnaya: 19.2%California Post: 10.3%Framing Effect15.3%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.4%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.5%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.5%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 1.3%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.6%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 45.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 22.6%California Post: 16.0%Negativity Bias45.0%This article: 5.7%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.9%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias5.7%This article: 3.5%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.5%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error3.5%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 11.6%Khristina Narizhnaya: 2.7%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias11.6%This article: 4.5%Khristina Narizhnaya: 4.3%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 3.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 1.3%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.2%Khristina Narizhnaya: 2.0%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias8.2%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.6%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 19.3%Khristina Narizhnaya: 13.9%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem19.3%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 1.9%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.7%Khristina Narizhnaya: 3.8%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority9.7%This article: 11.1%Khristina Narizhnaya: 1.7%California Post: 1.5%False Dilemma11.1%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.7%Khristina Narizhnaya: 2.7%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization9.7%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.5%Khristina Narizhnaya: 8.4%California Post: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion4.5%This article: 2.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.3%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question2.0%This article: 3.5%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.5%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.5%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 1.0%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 1.8%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 2.3%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 14.6%Khristina Narizhnaya: 8.1%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy14.6%This article: 13.4%Khristina Narizhnaya: 3.0%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote13.4%This article: 16.8%Khristina Narizhnaya: 3.5%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection16.8%This article: 14.4%Khristina Narizhnaya: 22.7%California Post: 13.1%Biased Writer Voice14.4%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 4.5%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.7%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias4.5%This article: 5.7%Khristina Narizhnaya: 17.0%California Post: 3.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Khristina Narizhnaya: 0.0%California Post: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

404 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers27%attributed speech293writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageMike Heisy • 4 words • 100.0% coverageMike Heisy • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageFox News Digital • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageAbigail Jackson • 23 words • 100.0% coverageAbigail Jackson • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Fox News Digital

100%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words35% of attributed speech79% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Fox News Digital: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-19.8 ptsWriter: 19.8%Fox News Digital: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-11.6 ptsWriter: 11.6%Fox News Digital: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-6.1 ptsWriter: 6.1%Fox News Digital: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.