Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos859 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert De Niro results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 41.3% saturation with 1,231 hits. Analysis detected 8,687 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,981 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 93% (2,770 of 37,536 keywords). This Robert De Niro is worse (more manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group.
Robert De Niro
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
93%Robert De Niro (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,981
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

93% percentile
025507510092.6% percentile
8.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 41.3%41.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 22.8%22.8%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 17.5%17.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 32.4%32.4%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.6%15.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 23.8%23.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 14.7%14.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 10.1%10.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ad Hominem: Keyword 41.3%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Keyword 32.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 24.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 23.8%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 22.8%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 1.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 6.9%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.7%Ad HominemSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos