Keyword summary
54% 17 analyzed articles/videos 10,693 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jon Ossoff results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 5,467 hits . Analysis detected 48,194 faulty-reasoning hits from 42,774 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (24,765 of 36,204 keywords). This Jon Ossoff is better (less manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group. Jon Ossoff
Keyword details
Total words: 42,774
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score17 analyzed articles42.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst