Keyword summary
51% 9 analyzed articles/videos 1,627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Nuclear Deal results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,713 hits . Analysis detected 13,787 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,214 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (28,201 of 37,536 keywords). This Iran Nuclear Deal is better (less manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group. Iran Nuclear Deal
Keyword details
Total words: 15,214
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score9 analyzed articles15.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst