Keyword summary
80% 12 analyzed articles/videos 6,659 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Impeachment results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 4,115 hits . Analysis detected 43,991 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,469 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,043 of 37,163 keywords). This Impeachment is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group. Impeachment
Keyword details
Total words: 36,469
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score12 analyzed articles36.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst