Author summary
⁠68%2 analyzed articles/videos431 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Audrey Fahlberg results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 2,202 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,724 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (1,661 of 6,628 authors). This Audrey Fahlberg is worse (more manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Audrey Fahlberg
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠75%Audrey Fahlberg (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,724
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

75% percentile
025507510075.0% percentile
4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.6%10.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 10.8%10.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.0%14.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 7.7%7.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 10.8%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos