Keyword summary
74% 54 analyzed articles/videos 30,471 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hollywood results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 18,234 hits . Analysis detected 181,927 faulty-reasoning hits from 175,247 analyzed words across 54 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (27,417 of 34,832 keywords). This Hollywood is better (less manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group. Hollywood
Keyword details
Total words: 175,247
Article count: 54
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score54 analyzed articles175.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst