Keyword summary
77% 29 analyzed articles/videos 9,089 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Policy results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 6,436 hits . Analysis detected 48,031 faulty-reasoning hits from 53,739 analyzed words across 29 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,389 of 37,536 keywords). This Government Policy is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group. Government Policy
Keyword details
Total words: 53,739
Article count: 29
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score29 analyzed articles53.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst