Keyword summary
78% 16 analyzed articles/videos 23,543 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gen Z results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 11,850 hits . Analysis detected 90,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 97,287 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (30,441 of 35,700 keywords). This Gen Z is better (less manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group. Gen Z
Keyword details
Total words: 97,287
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score16 analyzed articles97.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst