Author summary
â 17% 8 analyzed articles/videos 24,226 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yascha Mounk results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , False Dilemma , and Overconfidence Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 16,871 hits . Analysis detected 97,662 faulty-reasoning hits from 163,032 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of â 3% (6,018 of 6,170 authors). This Yascha Mounk is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group. Yascha Mounk
Author details
Total words: 163,032
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.5% percentile 1.1% BS Score8 analyzed articles163K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst