Author summary
64% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,153 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Orianna Rosa Royle results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Anecdotal , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,421 hits . Analysis detected 12,464 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,612 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,936 of 6,316 authors). This Orianna Rosa Royle is worse (more manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group. Orianna Rosa Royle
Author details
Total words: 12,612
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.5% percentile 2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.5% 7.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.3% 11.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst