Keyword summary
85% 9 analyzed articles/videos 3,533 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ftc results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 3,787 hits . Analysis detected 33,122 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,312 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (23,793 of 34,833 keywords). This Ftc is better (less manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group. Ftc
Keyword details
Total words: 29,312
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score9 analyzed articles29.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst