Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video188 analyzed words
BS Summary: These OAN Staff Sylvia Stewart results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Indoctrination, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 120 hits. Analysis detected 890 faulty-reasoning hits from 752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 87% (914 of 6,628 authors). This OAN Staff Sylvia Stewart is worse (more manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group.
OAN Staff Sylvia Stewart
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
87%OAN Staff Sylvia Stewart (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 752
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510086.2% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles752 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.8%4.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 13.3%13.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 10.6%10.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 6.9%6.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 13.8%13.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 13.3%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 10.6%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Author 6.9%, sitewide 0.4%In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos