Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 188 analyzed words
BS Summary: These OAN Staff Sylvia Stewart results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Indoctrination , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 120 hits . Analysis detected 890 faulty-reasoning hits from 752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 87% (914 of 6,628 authors). This OAN Staff Sylvia Stewart is worse (more manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group. OAN Staff Sylvia Stewart
Author details
Total words: 752
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.2% percentile 5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles752 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 13.3% 13.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 10.6% 10.6% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 6.9% 6.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 13.8% 13.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.8% 5.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.0%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 13.3%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 10.6%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 4.0% Burden of Proof: Author 6.9%, sitewide 0.4% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst