Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 458 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marketplace results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Availability Heuristic , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 174 hits . Analysis detected 1,399 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,832 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 81% (79 of 398 publications). This Marketplace is worse (more manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 1,832
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.4% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 9.5% 9.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Publication 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 7.4% 7.4% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 7.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Nature: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst