Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Stacy Mitchell results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 785 hits . Analysis detected 6,586 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,549 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Stacy Mitchell is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Stacy Mitchell
Author details
Total words: 9,549
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.8% 7.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.8%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst