Keyword summary
7% 7 analyzed articles/videos 7,282 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Reserve System results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 1,470 hits . Analysis detected 12,467 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,580 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 1% (34,892 of 34,992 keywords). This Federal Reserve System is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group. Federal Reserve System
Keyword details
Total words: 32,580
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.3% percentile 0.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles32.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst