Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video5,852 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Rennison results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 2.3% saturation with 548 hits. Analysis detected 5,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (6,351 of 6,359 authors). This Joe Rennison is better (less manipulative) than 99.90% of the peer group.
Joe Rennison
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison (selected)1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 23,408
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.1% percentile
0.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles23.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos