Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos7,471 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lydia DePillis results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 1,082 hits. Analysis detected 11,166 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,884 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 1% (6,330 of 6,363 authors). This Lydia DePillis is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group.
Lydia DePillis
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
1%Lydia DePillis (selected)1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 29,884
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

1% percentile
02550751000.5% percentile
0.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles29.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate