Keyword summary
59% 15 analyzed articles/videos 13,103 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Funding results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 5,700 hits . Analysis detected 41,874 faulty-reasoning hits from 57,411 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (34,837 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Funding is better (less manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group. Federal Funding
Keyword details
Total words: 57,411
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.2% percentile 1.5% BS Score15 analyzed articles57.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst