Mother Jones50%
The Only Research Center For Disabled Parents Is Losing Federal Funding 74%
By Julia Métraux63%
7/16/2026, 6:58:05 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.7% saturation with 160 hits. Analysis detected 889 faulty-reasoning hits from 475 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 65.7% and a BS Rank of 74% (5,682 of 21,180 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the article peer group.
Researchers and staff involved with Brandeis University’s National Research Center for Parents with Disabilities have learned that they will not be able to soon apply for continued federal funding, likely forcing the center’s operations to stop when current funding runs out at the end of August.
Working across roughly a decade, the center has investigated laws that allow states to strip parents of custody based on disability and health disparities faced by disabled parents, and provides assistance to disabled parents who reach out for support.
It is the only research center in the US focused on disabled parents.
Without further funding, “there’s going to be no national infrastructure dedicated” to those issues that offers evidence-based solutions to parties including judges in the child welfare system, healthcare providers, and disabled parents themselves, said principal investigator Monika Mitra.
Last week, the grant through which the center is funded was removed from the federal grant portal Grants.gov.
The grant is one of 36 awards, together worth more than $6.5 million, from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research that were expected to be made available but removed from the federal database so far this year.
Mitra was told by an inside contact at NIDILRR that the grant would not be reposted.
“The parenting center’s absence would leave a gaping hole of critical support,” said Heather Watkins, a disabled parent who sits on the research center’s board.
In May, the White House Office of Management and Budget, led by Project 2025 architect Russell Vought, released a proposal that, if finalized, would have the federal government arbitrarily terminate grants and involve political appointees more deeply in the grantmaking process.
The Office of Management and Budget did not respond to a request for comment, referring me to the Department of Health and Human Services.
HHS did not respond to a request for comment.
Mia Ives-Rublee, the disability justice initiative senior director at the Center for American Progress, said that the “absolutely essential” center’s funding cutoff represents part of a “continual attack on the disability community.”
Nicole Lomerson, now a research associate at the center, used its public resources after her parenting was called into question due to her cerebral palsy when her infant was in neonatal intensive care.
Now, as part of the center’s work, Lomerson responds to disabled parents seeking support with regard to the child welfare system.
“We were really hoping to expand our technical assistance efforts to parents,” Lomerson said.
“We were thinking about novel ways to provide support that was meaningful, that was delivered by peers.”
Mitra said she was stunned to find the center wasn’t able to apply for further funding under a grant she’d expected to be available.
“It is a profound setback for disability rights and family equity,” she said.
Speakers
4speakers34%attributed speech312writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageMia Ives-Rublee
32 attributed words20% of attributed speech65% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.