Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video2,120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mia Ives-Rublee results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 423.375 hits. Analysis detected 3,856.861 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (27,831 of 28,364 speakers). This Mia Ives-Rublee is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group.
Mia Ives-Rublee
Speaker details
Total words: 2,120
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751001.9% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 17.8%17.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Red Herring: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos