Topic summary
⁠35%4 analyzed articles/videos894 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Funding Cuts results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 1,074 hits. Analysis detected 7,410 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,907 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,421 of 15,689 topics). This Funding Cuts is better (less manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Funding Cuts
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,907
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.8%12.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos