Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Disability Advocacy results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 461 hits. Analysis detected 4,283 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,372 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,482 topics). This Disability Advocacy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Disability Advocacy
Topic details
Total words: 3,372
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.4%11.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos