Keyword summary
40% 7 analyzed articles/videos 6,476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Welfare results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 3,435 hits . Analysis detected 26,440 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,020 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (28,765 of 36,641 keywords). This Child Welfare is better (less manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group. Child Welfare
Keyword details
Total words: 28,020
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles28K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst