Author summary
49% 1 analyzed article/video 3,088 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shoshana Walter results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 1,055 hits . Analysis detected 6,633 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (4,201 of 6,628 authors). This Shoshana Walter is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Shoshana Walter
Author details
Total words: 9,264
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.4% 11.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.5% 9.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.7% 7.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst