Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 787 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ross Marchand results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Slippery Slope , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.1% saturation with 1,072 hits . Analysis detected 5,437 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,006 of 6,244 authors). This Ross Marchand is worse (more manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. Ross Marchand
Author details
Total words: 3,148
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.9% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 34.0% 34.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 14.9% 14.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.3% 7.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 34.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Slippery Slope: Author 14.9%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.4%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 11.5%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst