Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video787 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ross Marchand results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Slippery Slope, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.1% saturation with 1,072 hits. Analysis detected 5,437 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,006 of 6,244 authors). This Ross Marchand is worse (more manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group.
Ross Marchand
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
84%Ross Marchand (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,148
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

84% percentile
025507510083.9% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 34.0%34.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.6%7.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 14.9%14.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 11.5%11.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.7%7.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.3%7.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.0%5.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 34.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 22.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Author 14.9%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.4%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Author 11.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos