BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 54.7% saturation with 239 hits. Analysis detected 1,854 faulty-reasoning hits from 437 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 78.9% and a BS Rank of 87% (3,006 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 86.30% of the article peer group.

The White House has released a 162-page report criticizing the leadership of the Smithsonian Institution and accusing it of engaging in “extreme political activism,” as well as presenting a “radical view of American history” in their museums. 
The report, which was published on Saturday, centered on the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History (NMAH), claiming that it had adopted “an ideological framework that no longer treats the American story as a shared national inheritance to be taught or celebrated, but as a political instrument to divide, dispirit, and discourage our citizens.” 
The White House report alleges that leadership at the NMAH has been following a “radical, activist ideology” that opposes the nation’s “noble, honest story. 
” 
The findings also center on a “lack of attention” dedicated to America’s founders, the inclusion of educational materials on “gender fluidity” and what the report describes as a crusade against “Whiteness. 
” 
“The serious concerns raised in this report are not about a few exhibits or a few controversial labels,” the report continued. 
“As it stands today, it would benefit most Americans, especially parents bringing their children for a tour, if the Smithsonian’s flagship history museum had a label at every entrance that reads: ‘Warning: the exhibits in this museum were prepared by people who don’t want you to love your country.'” 
However, despite the claims from Washington, a Smithsonian spokesperson told *ABC News* that the institution remains committed to “unbiased” learning. 
“For more than 180 years, the Smithsonian has served the American public with nonpartisan and independent scholarship, and we remain committed to doing so,” the spokesperson said on Sunday. 
In May, Lonnie Bunch III, the secretary of the Smithsonian, stated that the goals of the institution are driven purely by unbiased research and scholarship. 
“My goal is that history is driven by scholarship, not partisanship,” Bunch told *CNN*. 
“The Smithsonian always does its own scholarship. 
It’s always driven by that. 
We have always worked with different administrations, but it’s always about what our scholarship tells us.” 
Nonetheless, the White House identified several materials as “problematic” and it accuses the museum of “anti-White activism,” “illegal alien activism” and “transgender activism.” 
The administration’s inquiry stems from President Donald Trump’s March 27, 2025, executive order, “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.” 
This order directs Vice President JD Vance, alongside domestic policy advisers, to “remove improper ideology” from the Smithsonian, asserting that materials portraying the nation in a “negative light” do not belong in any federally-funded cultural institution. 
Stay informed! 
Receive breaking news alerts directly to your inbox for free. 
Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 5.0%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.1%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias4.6%This article: 11.7%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 2.7%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic11.7%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.7%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias6.4%This article: 54.7%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 12.0%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect54.7%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.3%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.6%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 2.9%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias8.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.1%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 52.6%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 10.7%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias52.6%This article: 3.2%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 2.2%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.1%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.5%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 12.4%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 2.4%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect12.4%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.3%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect6.6%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 2.7%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 25.2%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.7%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man25.2%This article: 12.4%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 5.9%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority12.4%This article: 15.1%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma15.1%This article: 5.3%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope5.3%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 29.1%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 4.4%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization29.1%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 30.7%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 9.5%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion30.7%This article: 10.3%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question10.3%This article: 4.6%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 3.4%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.6%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.0%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.7%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.5%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.8%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.5%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 1.6%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading1.6%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 33.4%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 2.2%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote33.4%This article: 32.5%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 3.1%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection32.5%This article: 31.1%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 5.6%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice31.1%This article: 19.5%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 2.4%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination19.5%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 3.8%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 2.7%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.4%

437 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers27%attributed speech321writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 100.0% coverageSmithsonian spokesperson • 20 words • 0.0% coverageSmithsonian spokesperson • 29 words • 100.0% coverageLonnie Bunch III • 25 words • 0.0% coverageLonnie Bunch III • 14 words • 0.0% coverageLonnie Bunch III • 7 words • 0.0% coverageLonnie Bunch III • 5 words • 0.0% coverageLonnie Bunch III • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
49 attributed words42% of attributed speech99% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Biased Writer Voice+25.9 ptsWriter: 33.3%Smithsonian spokesperson: 59.2%59.2%Unattributed Quote-45.5 ptsWriter: 45.5%Smithsonian spokesperson: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-44.2 ptsWriter: 44.2%Smithsonian spokesperson: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-26.5 ptsWriter: 26.5%Smithsonian spokesperson: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.7 ptsWriter: 4.7%Smithsonian spokesperson: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.