Keyword summary
â 38% 6 analyzed articles/videos 7,596 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Polarization results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 2,615 hits . Analysis detected 26,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,976 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of â 23% (26,892 of 34,582 keywords). This Political Polarization is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Political Polarization
Keyword details
Total words: 27,976
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles28K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Straw Man: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst