Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video39 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Smithsonian spokesperson results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Primacy Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 59.2% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 136 faulty-reasoning hits from 39 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 55.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,614 of 28,364 speakers). This Smithsonian spokesperson is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
Smithsonian spokesperson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠74%Smithsonian spokesperson (selected)56%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 39
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510073.2% percentile
55.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos39 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 59.2%59.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 59.2%59.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 59.2%59.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 59.2%59.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 40.8%40.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 59.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 59.2%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 59.2%, sitewide 6.7%Primacy Effect: Speaker 59.2%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 40.8%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos