Keyword summary
42% 9 analyzed articles/videos 7,365 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Excessive Force results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 4,875 hits . Analysis detected 39,339 faulty-reasoning hits from 44,460 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (29,961 of 34,833 keywords). This Excessive Force is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group. Excessive Force
Keyword details
Total words: 44,460
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score9 analyzed articles44.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst