Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,606 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Topher Sanders results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 651 hits . Analysis detected 5,149 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,424 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of â 39% (3,919 of 6,363 authors). This Topher Sanders is better (less manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group. Topher Sanders
Author details
Total words: 6,424
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Burden of Proof: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.4% Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst