Police Chased the Wrong Man, Then Shot Him and Watched as He Bled Out 28%

By Akela Lacy76%

6/18/2026, 1:25:52 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 33 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 375 hits. Analysis detected 2,990 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,498 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39% and a BS Rank of 28% (15,771 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the article peer group.

In the early hours of January 6, 2026, two 911 callers near Ypsilanti, Michigan, reported a white van driving erratically. 
Within an hour, police had found a white van, crashed into it twice on purpose, and fired 27 shots at the driver while the vehicle lay on its side, burning. 
At least eight cops watched as 34-year old Navy veteran John Andrew Jenuwine bled out and died inside. 
Of several inconsistencies in the police response, one stood out: The only physical description provided to the dispatcher was that “two Black guys” were driving the van, and a caller said they’d brandished a handgun at his wife. 
Jenuwine was white, driving alone, and unarmed. 
That’s not what police told Jenuwine’s parents when they contacted them the following evening, 17 hours after killing their son. 
“We were told that there was an exchange of gunfire, and that John was killed,” John’s father, Larry Jenuwine, told The Intercept. 
“Call it naïveté or whatever you want to call it, but our first thoughts were, ‘Oh my God, what did he do, why did he cause this?’” 
On the phone with Larry and Kelly, John’s mother, a deputy with the Washtenaw County Sheriff’s Office claimed their recently deceased son had a gun. 
But Jenuwine, an industrial field engineer traveling to repair million-dollar lasers, just had his work equipment; no gun was ever found in his van. 
And the officers who caused two intentional collisions appear to have violated their own policies, which the department updated after the police killing of George Floyd  testing the limits of post-2020 police reforms. 
“We were told that there was an exchange of gunfire, and that John was killed. 
Come to find out, he didn’t do anything to cause any of this.” 
The Jenuwine family is now suing Washtenaw County and eight sheriff’s deputies who responded to the case for wrongful death; for violating John’s constitutional rights to protection under the law, and against unreasonable searches and seizures; and for gross negligence and willful misconduct, including improper use of deadly force. 
The suit seeks to hold the county responsible for what it calls the sheriff’s failures to train officers and enforce its policies. 
“Come to find out, he didn’t do anything to cause any of this,” Larry said. 
“He was not the guy that they were supposed to be chasing.” 
Less than 15 minutes elapsed between the time Washtenaw County Sheriff’s deputies incorrectly identified Jenuwine’s van and when they started shooting. 
Officers fired their first shots seconds after causing Jenuwine’s vehicle to flip on its side and catch fire. 
Only seven out of the 27 shots fired hit Jenuwine. 
None of them alone was responsible for killing him, according to an independent autopsy obtained by Jenuwine’s family and described by their attorneys in a press conference last week, which found he bled out and died over time. 
While Jenuwine struggled and died, dashcam footage shared with The Intercept recorded officers outside discussing whether any of the shots had hit him. 
After several minutes had passed, one officer said over the radio, “He’s kicking around inside the vehicle right now.” 
None of them called for emergency services. 
According to the footage, an edited version of which was viewed by The Intercept, Jenuwine lay dying in the van for at least five minutes. 
“The cruelty of it, I suppose, is what strikes me the most,” said Maura Battersby, one of the attorneys representing the family. 
“If aid had been rendered, he may have survived this.” 
Of the four deputies attorneys said fired shots, two names have been publicly released: Jacob Gombos and Jonathan Early. 
Both received awards in 2024 for distinguished service; Gombos got the department’s Life Saving Award. 
One of the officers who shot at Jenuwine had received the department's Life Saving Award. 
The sheriff’s office placed Gombos, Earley, and the other deputies involved on paid administrative leave pending an investigation by Michigan State Police, which was completed last month and is now pending review by the Michigan attorney general. 
The state AG will decide whether to bring criminal charges against any of the officers in the case. 
A spokesperson for the Michigan State Police confirmed that their investigation is closed and referred questions to the attorney general’s office, which did not respond to a request for comment. 
Spokespeople for the Washtenaw County Sheriff’s Office and the Ypsilanti Police Department did not respond to requests for comment. 
They are in the news constantly, and it’s not for a good reason.” 
The case has brought renewed scrutiny to the Washtenaw County Sheriff’s Office, which is currently facing dual lawsuits from whistleblowers who claimed the department hired unqualified officers and fired them in retaliation for reporting it. 
Both plaintiffs are former office staff who said they were fired after raising concerns that Sheriff Alyshia Dyer and other staff pushed them to hire candidates who had lied about their qualifications and in one case had an “extensive” criminal history. 
Another sheriff’s deputy resigned in March while under investigation for allegedly having a sexual relationship with a subordinate officer. 
Dyer herself was also independently investigated last year after a partially burned cannabis cigarette was found in her county-issued vehicle. 
(She denied it was hers, and an independent report could not determine whether the joint belonged to Dyer.) 
“It seems like every day we hear something about the Washtenaw Sheriff's department,” Kelly Jenuwine told The Intercept. 
Jenuwine’s killing raises a new round of questions about the efficacy of police reform. 
In 2024, Michigan implemented new statewide guidelines restricting vehicle pursuits to “protect the lives of innocent bystanders.” 
Following the police killing of George Floyd in 2020, the Washtenaw County Sheriff’s office released a memo outlining how its policies aligned with a series of proposed reforms pushed by activists against police violence that grew out of 2014 protests in Ferguson, Missouri. 
And the sheriff’s office adopted a new use of force policy in 2022, which classifies intentional vehicle collisions  known as a “PIT” maneuver, a precision immobilization technique  as deadly force. 
“That’s something you’re trained not to do,” said Todd Flood, the lead attorney on the Jenuwines’ case. 
The new policy also guides officers to “seek voluntary compliance and operate with minimal reliance on the use of force,” using techniques in crisis intervention and “rapport-building communication,” and try to de-escalate, even after using force. 
It requires a mandatory medical evaluation when deadly force is applied, if an officer observes an injury, or if they believe one has occurred; and it ties the degree of appropriate force to how certain they are that the subject committed a crime. 
The policy states: “Sheriff’s Office employees shall never employ excessive force.” 
Officers did not verbally engage with Jenuwine a single time, Battersby told The Intercept. 
“I would have expected them to be calling out over the loudspeaker,” Battersby said. 
“There were many instances in which they were in close proximity to him, and it doesn't appear that they did that.” 
At a press conference after the shooting, the Washtenaw County Sheriff’s Office played a dashcam video that showed Jenuwine reversing his van and driving on the wrong side of the road. 
Before the sheriffs hit Jenuwine’s van in the first PIT maneuver, the dashcam video cuts ahead, with the video timestamp jumping forward 30 seconds. 
The Jenuwines said what they describe as John's “execution” changed the way they look at law enforcement after having considered themselves generally supportive of police. 
“I want the people that executed my son to never have the opportunity to work in law enforcement again,” said Kelly. 
“They ran around with those guns like they were playing video games, guns held sideways,” Larry said, referring to the dashcam footage. 
“I'm still struggling with this and I anticipate that's going to be a continuing struggle.” 
Despite believing the vast majority of police were “good, honest, hard-working people,” he said, “I don't believe these guys that were involved in this shooting were. 
And that's the kind of people we need to get out of that system.” 
“We want to make sure that the people involved in this, in John's death, are held accountable,” Larry said. 
“We're hoping that there will be criminal charges as well, but we can't count on that.” 
Jenuwine liked to spend his time outdoors fishing and hunting with his family, his parents told The Intercept. 
He was on his high school football team, spent six years in the Navy, and was a member of a Detroit motorcycle club. 
When he was growing up, he and Larry worked on cars and tractors together. 
On what would have been Jenuwine’s 35th birthday last month, his parents said they spent the evening crying over a birthday cake. 
“Those officers get to go home to their families every night,” Kelly said. 
“What Larry and I get, we get a box of ashes and a lock of my son's hair.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.4%Akela Lacy: 4.2%The Intercept: 5.3%Confirmation Bias13.4%This article: 2.5%Akela Lacy: 0.5%The Intercept: 0.5%Anchoring Bias2.5%This article: 5.2%Akela Lacy: 2.8%The Intercept: 3.0%Availability Heuristic5.2%This article: 1.4%Akela Lacy: 1.9%The Intercept: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic1.4%This article: 5.1%Akela Lacy: 0.7%The Intercept: 0.7%Hindsight Bias5.1%This article: 1.2%Akela Lacy: 1.3%The Intercept: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias1.2%This article: 13.0%Akela Lacy: 11.5%The Intercept: 9.2%Framing Effect13.0%This article: 2.1%Akela Lacy: 0.8%The Intercept: 0.4%Loss Aversion2.1%This article: 1.1%Akela Lacy: 0.6%The Intercept: 0.4%Status Quo Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 1.3%The Intercept: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Akela Lacy: 1.5%The Intercept: 2.2%Pessimism Bias1.7%This article: 25.0%Akela Lacy: 11.6%The Intercept: 12.3%Negativity Bias25.0%This article: 2.8%Akela Lacy: 2.2%The Intercept: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 1.2%The Intercept: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 1.5%Akela Lacy: 0.4%The Intercept: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 4.7%The Intercept: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Akela Lacy: 1.2%The Intercept: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.5%This article: 5.7%Akela Lacy: 2.3%The Intercept: 1.0%Halo Effect5.7%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.9%Akela Lacy: 1.8%The Intercept: 1.3%Recency Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 0.4%The Intercept: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 2.9%The Intercept: 2.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 1.0%The Intercept: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.9%Akela Lacy: 2.5%The Intercept: 3.4%Appeal to Authority4.9%This article: 0.8%Akela Lacy: 2.5%The Intercept: 2.0%False Dilemma0.8%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 0.6%The Intercept: 1.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.1%Akela Lacy: 7.4%The Intercept: 7.2%Hasty Generalization2.1%This article: 7.8%Akela Lacy: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.3%Red Herring7.8%This article: 0.9%Akela Lacy: 1.0%The Intercept: 0.4%Bandwagon0.9%This article: 12.6%Akela Lacy: 8.4%The Intercept: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion12.6%This article: 1.9%Akela Lacy: 0.8%The Intercept: 1.4%Begging the Question1.9%This article: 7.8%Akela Lacy: 3.4%The Intercept: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.8%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 10.6%Akela Lacy: 1.1%The Intercept: 0.7%Burden of Proof10.6%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 1.5%Akela Lacy: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.4%Composition/Division1.5%This article: 11.3%Akela Lacy: 1.5%The Intercept: 2.3%Anecdotal11.3%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.3%Akela Lacy: 1.7%The Intercept: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.3%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.9%Akela Lacy: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.9%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 0.5%The Intercept: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 15.6%Akela Lacy: 2.1%The Intercept: 2.1%Unattributed Quote15.6%This article: 6.1%Akela Lacy: 1.3%The Intercept: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection6.1%This article: 14.8%Akela Lacy: 5.2%The Intercept: 10.5%Biased Writer Voice14.8%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 1.7%The Intercept: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 4.4%Akela Lacy: 6.7%The Intercept: 6.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Akela Lacy: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1498 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers37%attributed speech939writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Jenuwine • 22 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Jenuwine • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWashtenaw County Sheriff’s Office • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Jenuwine • 15 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Jenuwine • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageMaura Battersby • 22 words • 0.0% coverageMaura Battersby • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMichigan attorney general • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMichigan State Police • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWashtenaw County Sheriff’s Office • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageAlyshia Dyer • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageAlyshia Dyer • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageKelly Jenuwine • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Flood • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageMaura Battersby • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMaura Battersby • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMaura Battersby • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWashtenaw County Sheriff’s Office • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageKelly Jenuwine • 21 words • 100.0% coverageLarry Jenuwine • 22 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Jenuwine • 15 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Jenuwine • 26 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Jenuwine • 14 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Jenuwine • 19 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Jenuwine • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageKelly Jenuwine • 13 words • 0.0% coverageKelly Jenuwine • 18 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kelly Jenuwine

100%flagged-word coverage
70 attributed words13% of attributed speech93% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Quote-first Misdirection+25.3 ptsWriter: 4.7%Kelly Jenuwine: 30.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice-23.5 ptsWriter: 23.5%Kelly Jenuwine: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-22.2 ptsWriter: 22.2%Kelly Jenuwine: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-7.0 ptsWriter: 7.0%Kelly Jenuwine: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.