Topic summary
43% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wrongful Death Lawsuits results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 1,934 hits . Analysis detected 12,064 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,404 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (13,471 of 16,562 topics). This Wrongful Death Lawsuits is better (less manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group. Wrongful Death Lawsuits
Topic details
Total words: 14,404
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles14.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 13.4% 13.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst