L.A. TACO85%

He Went To Celebrate The Lakers Win. And Came Home With His Arm Broken By LAPD. 38%

By Lexis-Olivier Ray0% Lizbeth Solorzano0%

6/11/2026, 5:29:42 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 160 hits. Analysis detected 1,819 faulty-reasoning hits from 762 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44.1% and a BS Rank of 38% (13,087 of 20,882 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 62.70% of the article peer group.

Welcome to L.A. 
TACO’s weekly Investigations Newsletter, I’m Lexis-Olivier Ray, the Head of Investigations for L.A. 
TACO. 
After a year of tremendous loss, Pablo Vera finally had something to celebrate when the Lakers won their 17th NBA title on October 11, 2020, nearly a year after Kobe Bryant and his daughter Gianna were among the nine people tragically killed in a helicopter crash in Calabasas. 
A lifelong Laker fan, Vera went out that night to take in the historic victory and document the events that unfolded. 
At around 9 p.m. that night, Vera was standing on 12th Street in Downtown, near what was then known as the Staples Center (RIP), when LAPD Officer Alexander Alvarez allegedly struck him with a Japanese wooden sword known as a “bokken,” breaking his arm. 
At the time, Alvarez was assigned to the LAPD’s infamous Mounted Unit, a team of around 35 sworn officers and 40 horses that generally respond to crowd-control situations and special events. 
In March of this year, Alvarez was captured in a viral video that I recorded, knocking over a protester during a No Kings Day protest in Downtown. 
In 2022, Vera sued the City of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles Police Department for excessive force and violating his civil rights. 
Six years after the alleged attack, Vera finally had his day in court. 
For the past three days, L.A. 
TACO’s investigative intern, Lizbeth Solorzano, has sat through jury selection, opening statements, and two days of testimony in the civil case between Vera and the City of Los Angeles. 
Like many people, most of Lizzy’s understanding of the legal system came from watching TV shows and movies. 
“So when I had the opportunity to witness it firsthand, I was eager to jump into it,” she tells me. 
Lizzy has never covered a trial. 
But I can confirm, so far, she’s handling it like she’s done this before. 
Below are some of her reflections from Monday and Tuesday. 
By the way, the only reason we’re able to send Lizzy to cover this trial is because of the hundreds of generous people who donated to our fundraiser. 
We appreciate the support! 
THE HORSE IN THE ROOM 
1. 
Jury selection alone was a long, grueling process that took a few days to be solidified. 
As a journalist, I felt it was important to be here to capture details that wouldn’t make it into official records. 
It’s one thing for attorneys to describe the six-foot horse that Alvarez was riding at the time of the alleged assault, it’s another to see a life-sized cutout of a horse standing in the corner of the courtroom. 
When attorneys professionally argued over the “elephant in the room” (or rather, the horse), even a few jurors couldn’t help but giggle. 
2. 
Beyond the unusual courtroom props, I became aware of how much can be communicated through the body language and demeanor of those participating in a trial. 
When LAPD Officer Scott Coffey took the stand, he entered confidently. 
But as the plaintiff’s attorneys confronted him with his own body-camera footage and deposition testimony from six years earlier, that confidence faded. 
His voice softened, eye contact diminished, and the contradictions in his testimony became increasingly apparent. 
This reinforced that attorneys, like journalists, are storytellers. 
They build narratives to sway jurors. 
3. 
During opening statements, the plaintiff in the case, Pablo Vera, was portrayed as simply a devoted fan who felt moved by the Lakers' championship, and that’s why he went out to celebrate with the community. 
He is indeed a fan, but I don’t think the attorney captured the fullness of his passion. 
When Kobe Bryant’s death occurred in early 2020, it was a loss felt by all. 
After speaking with Vera briefly, I learned that he felt inspired to commemorate Bryant by documenting the celebrations. 
So when the Lakers won Game 6 of the NBA Finals, during the height of the pandemic, he knew he had to be there to witness a win in a world that was feeling dread. 
Little did he know that, in capturing the emotions of fans, he’d have his arm broken in the process. 
All he wants from this is closure, he says. 
He waited 6 years for it. 
Was this newsletter forwarded to you? 
If you’d like to receive it weekly, sign up for an L.A. 
TACO membership here, head over to the “My Account” section, click on “Newsletters,” and make sure the “Investigations Newsletter” is toggled on. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 4.3%L.A. TACO: 3.9%Confirmation Bias10.0%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 1.0%L.A. TACO: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.9%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 4.2%L.A. TACO: 4.1%Availability Heuristic12.9%This article: 3.4%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.8%L.A. TACO: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic3.4%This article: 4.2%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.4%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Hindsight Bias4.2%This article: 1.8%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 1.2%L.A. TACO: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias1.8%This article: 12.7%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 7.3%L.A. TACO: 11.6%Framing Effect12.7%This article: 7.1%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.8%L.A. TACO: 0.6%Loss Aversion7.1%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.4%L.A. TACO: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.5%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect3.7%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 1.1%L.A. TACO: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 1.2%L.A. TACO: 0.9%Pessimism Bias4.6%This article: 21.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 10.8%L.A. TACO: 11.3%Negativity Bias21.0%This article: 8.7%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 2.8%L.A. TACO: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias8.7%This article: 0.8%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 2.1%L.A. TACO: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.8%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.7%L.A. TACO: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 1.6%L.A. TACO: 5.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 1.0%L.A. TACO: 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 1.6%L.A. TACO: 6.0%Halo Effect7.3%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.4%L.A. TACO: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.6%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 2.1%L.A. TACO: 1.0%Recency Bias10.6%This article: 1.7%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.4%L.A. TACO: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.7%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 1.5%L.A. TACO: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 4.6%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.7%L.A. TACO: 0.4%Straw Man4.6%This article: 4.5%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 2.5%L.A. TACO: 3.6%Appeal to Authority4.5%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 1.2%L.A. TACO: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 1.0%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.7%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 6.9%L.A. TACO: 5.8%Hasty Generalization9.7%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.3%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 1.0%L.A. TACO: 1.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 6.3%L.A. TACO: 10.8%Appeal to Emotion16.0%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.7%L.A. TACO: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 19.8%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 2.4%L.A. TACO: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)19.8%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.7%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.8%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Burden of Proof3.7%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 1.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.4%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Composition/Division1.0%This article: 13.1%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 5.6%L.A. TACO: 5.8%Anecdotal13.1%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 1.2%L.A. TACO: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.0%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.4%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.8%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.6%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 1.1%L.A. TACO: 1.4%Unattributed Quote9.6%This article: 1.2%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.5%L.A. TACO: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection1.2%This article: 20.7%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 5.3%L.A. TACO: 8.7%Biased Writer Voice20.7%This article: 6.6%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 1.2%L.A. TACO: 2.0%Indoctrination6.6%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 1.2%L.A. TACO: 3.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 15.7%Lexis-Olivier Ray: 1.6%L.A. TACO: 2.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…15.7%

762 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers11%attributed speech681writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageorganization TACO’s weekly Investigations Newsletter • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageTACO’s investigative intern, Lizbeth Solorzano • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageLizbeth Solorzano • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coveragePablo Vera • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageorganization TACO membership • 22 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Pablo Vera

100%flagged-word coverage
9 attributed words11% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+93.5 ptsWriter: 6.5%Pablo Vera: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-23.2 ptsWriter: 23.2%Pablo Vera: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -14.4 ptsWriter: 14.4%Pablo Vera: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-4.1 ptsWriter: 4.1%Pablo Vera: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.3 ptsWriter: 1.3%Pablo Vera: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.