Speaker summary
⁠83%2 analyzed articles/videos62 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pablo Vera results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 71% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 115 faulty-reasoning hits from 62 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 37.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,642 of 28,364 speakers). This Pablo Vera is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Pablo Vera
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 62
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510055.4% percentile
37.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos62 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 67.7%67.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 71.0%71.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 17.7%17.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 71.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 67.7%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos