Keyword summary
14% 8 analyzed articles/videos 5,640 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evidence results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 1,521 hits . Analysis detected 12,860 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,862 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (34,078 of 34,832 keywords). This Evidence is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group. Evidence
Keyword details
Total words: 23,862
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.2% percentile 1.2% BS Score8 analyzed articles23.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst